MTBF | Thomas Reiter
  Managing technical uncertainties

Statistics, RAMS & Quality Management
Search this site Search this siteSearch this site
  • IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII------Service-----IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
    • xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-beachte_class="first_item"_im_ersten_li_tag_xxxxxxxx
    • MTBF Calculation
    • xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-beachte_class="last_item"_im_ersten_li_tag_sowie_zusaetzliche_/ul_und_/li_tags_am_schluss_xxxxxxxx

  • IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-----Knowledge---IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
    • xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-beachte_class="first_item"_im_ersten_li_tag_xxxxxxxx
    • Reliability
    • xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • MTBF
    • xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Functional Safety
    • xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • FMEA & FMECA
    • xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Reliability Block Diagrams
    • xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Fault Tree Analysis
    • xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Event Tree Analysis
    • xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Markov Analysis
    • xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Weibull Analysis
    • xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-beachte_class="last_item"_im_ersten_li_tag_sowie_zusaetzliche_/ul_und_/li_tags_am_schluss_xxxxxxxx

  • IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-------Referenzen-----IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
    • xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-beachte_class="first_item"_im_ersten_li_tag_xxxxxxxx
    • Customers
    • xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-beachte_class="last_item"_im_ersten_li_tag_sowie_zusaetzliche_/ul_und_/li_tags_am_schluss_xxxxxxxx
    • Projects
  • IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-------About-----IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
  • IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-------Contact-----IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
  • IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-------German-----IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Sitemap

Reliability, Hazard Rate & Failure Rate

You are here:  Page Content  

Up

1. Reliability

Down

In contrast to the simple introduction into reliability metrics, the focus of this page is more on mathematics. Therefore it is better to begin with reliability instead of MTBF. 

Reliability R(t) is the probability that an item will perform 
R(t) is a decreasing function over time, because as time passes, more units would fail. Alternatively, if we focus on a distinct unit, we would interprete R(t) as the probability of survival of that unit over time.
The next picture shows a representation of how R(t) could look like:
R(t)
At time t = 0, no units have failed and the Reliability (probability of survival) is 1. For t > 0, more and more units would fail,  Therefore, the Reliability would tend towards 0 for t -->00. 
R(t) is always a monotonously decreasing function over time.
The most powerful tool for determining reliability is the reliability block diagram.

Up

2. Hazard Rate

Down

The hazard rate h(t) is the first derivative of R(t). h(t) is the change in probability of survival over time. Unlike R(t), h(t) is
not necessarily a monotonously decreasing function over time, however, in most practical cases it is.

If we consider two timepoints, t1 and t2, then the change in probability between t1 and t2 is the probability that a unit will fail between t1 and t2. Alternatively speaking, the same change in probability can be interpreted as the fraction of units of the initial population failing between t1 and t2.  If we make (t1 - t2) small enough, then we obtain the hazard rate h(t).

hazard rate
The negative symbol is neccessary in order to make h(t) a positive figure.
The next picture shows h(t) for the same R(t) of the picture before:

h(t)

In contrast to R(t), the range of h(t) is between 0 and a specific value determined by the nature of R(t). Furthermore, as mentioned above, h(t) need not necessarily be monotonous as the picture might suggest. 
In reliability analysis, the hazard rate is of less interest.

Up

3. Failure Rate

Down

Remember that the hazard rate is the rate of failure occurences with reference to the initial population size (at t =0). 
What we want is the rate of failure occurences with reference to the current population. This is called the failure rate Lambda(t). The following exemplary statements makes the difference between clear:

Failure rate Lambda(t):   1% of all functioning units are expected to fail within the next hour.

Hazard rate h(t):               0,4% of all  units that were functional at t=0 are expected to fail within the next hour.

--> In order to obtain the failure rate we must simply divide h(t) by R(t):
Failure rate lambda

As with the hazard rate h(t), Lambda (t) need not necessarily be monotonous. Its range is between 0 and a specific value determined by the nature of R(t). The next picture shows Lambda(t) for the same R(t) and h(t) of the pictures before:


Failure Rate vs. Time
Note that l(t) is constant over time. This is no coincidence, since the constant failure rate case is by far the most important case in reliability analysis. More on this can be found on the MTBF page. R(t), h(t) and Lambda(t) for different cases will be shown in the next paragraph.

How must R(t) look like in order to obtain constant failure rate? It's quite obvious that the derivative, h(t) must be a multiple of the primitive, R(t), for every t. This is accomplished by the exponential function. We don't show this in detail here, instead we will derive h(t) and lambda(t) for the general case using the Weibull distribution function (WEI).

Furtther reading: Weibull analysis

Up To top

Next Topic


Privacy Policy